
looks like a slab of precip might hit a good portion of us !

Quite impressive on satellite. Looks like a hurricane.Katdaddy wrote:The evening satellite image looks quite impressive over the NW GOM just offshore of TX and LA.
Completely agree with you.jasons wrote:I have a feeling when this week is all said and done, I will have a lot less rain than what the models were showing on yesterday...I’ll be lucky to get 3 or 4”, if that...
So in the past 3 days here we’ve had a 30% chance of rain, 40%, & 60% today. Guess which day we got rain? Friday, when we had our lowest chance lol we got nothing here the past couple days, but picked up 1.8” Friday afternoon. It’s funny how that works out sometimes. We actually ended up receiving 3.4” altogether this past week so I really don’t have anything to complain about, but I’d love another 3.4” this weekjasons wrote:So far I’m at 1.14”. - I’ll take that!
Most models were pretty aggressive with bands forming during the early morning and that still looks on track as better moisture advection begins to take place here over the next several hours. I do suspect that the largest outbreak of convection will be along the coastline though. Hopefully we can get some of that scattered north.Rip76 wrote:Wow, did the the atmosphere get worked over that bad this morning?
I figured something would fire by 10pm.
I looked at the NAM, RGEM, & GFS models a few minutes ago for my area (Wharton County) and none of them have much for my area the next couple days with these high rain chances. Best chance for rain appears to be along the coast and east of 45.Andrew wrote:Most models were pretty aggressive with bands forming during the early morning and that still looks on track as better moisture advection begins to take place here over the next several hours. I do suspect that the largest outbreak of convection will be along the coastline though. Hopefully we can get some of that scattered north.Rip76 wrote:Wow, did the the atmosphere get worked over that bad this morning?
I figured something would fire by 10pm.
Most of the convection is going to be scattered and is hard to properly initialize at such a small scale. That is why global models like the GFS usually have a hard time accurately displaying it. With these type of setups, I depend on the HRRR and Tx-tech wrf because they usually have the resolution to give a more accurate idea. Even then though sometimes you just have to wait until banding actually sets up. Over the next week, I do think most everyone will see 1-3 inches.Cpv17 wrote:I looked at the NAM, RGEM, & GFS models a few minutes ago for my area (Wharton County) and none of them have much for my area the next couple days with these high rain chances. Best chance for rain appears to be along the coast and east of 45.Andrew wrote:Most models were pretty aggressive with bands forming during the early morning and that still looks on track as better moisture advection begins to take place here over the next several hours. I do suspect that the largest outbreak of convection will be along the coastline though. Hopefully we can get some of that scattered north.Rip76 wrote:Wow, did the the atmosphere get worked over that bad this morning?
I figured something would fire by 10pm.
The GFS was ahead of the game if that scenario holds. Who’d a thunk it?Andrew wrote:djmike wrote:Whew! Dont need too much rain from 7. An eastern landfall woul be best for us but bad for them. Any chance it continues an eastern shift or a more western shift? Thoughts? I though the high was supposed to block it from going nortward and send more on a western track. Ensembles still show a southern Louisiana into setx. Track is now eastern Louisiana into northern Louisiana and onward north. Im confused.
I think the current track is going to verify pretty nicely. A lot of the models that were showing a strong west shift have adjusted further east. For instance, the ECMWF ensembles for the most part shifted a good bit east with a less west bend after landfall. .