January 2025
-
- Posts: 1008
- Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 4:46 pm
- Location: NW Houston, TX
- Contact:
The 18 gfs has a fairly sharp cutoff northern Harris to the north with only about an inch or so in Northern Harris.
I remember I made a last second decision to drive down to Galveston during the storm to see the snowfall based on the fact that something crazy was happening that I wasn't expecting, and I was down there during the event, the snowfall was crazy heavy that night.
Montgomery isd is closed Tuesday ans Wednesday.
-
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2018 1:21 am
- Location: Lake Conroe, TX
- Contact:
I think it’s time to throw out the global models and start looking at the short term modelsTexasBreeze wrote: ↑Sun Jan 19, 2025 4:44 pm The 18 gfs has a fairly sharp cutoff northern Harris to the north with only about an inch or so in Northern Harris.
There are probaly several people that only have a few places to look for models which are manly global models and not have access to short term specialized models
-
- Posts: 5357
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2021 11:35 pm
- Location: College Station, Texas
- Contact:
The pictures ive posted, like the rgem snow map above, thats from a paid site, it has a feature which allows me to zoom into certain regions in texas to see actual snowfall numbers for counties that it puts out, same features for all the other short range models on weatherbell, global models will almost never see the heavy snow bands
2004 was completely unexpected. If I remember correctly there were some soundings out of Corpus the evening before or day of that suggested the potential for some light snow but that was about it. Advisories weren't even issued until the late afternoon and upgraded to a warning before midnight after it was already coming down. Modeling was definitely different back then. 

Just honest models! 

I agree models have come a long way since back then.. Still can't shake the feeling that this is gonna come with surprisesScott747 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 19, 2025 5:00 pm 2004 was completely unexpected. If I remember correctly there were some soundings out of Corpus the evening before or day of that suggested the potential for some light snow but that was about it. Advisories weren't even issued until the late afternoon and upgraded to a warning before midnight after it was already coming down. Modeling was definitely different back then.![]()
ok thanks. Can you do a shot of golden triangle, please?Stratton20 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 19, 2025 5:00 pm The pictures ive posted, like the rgem snow map above, thats from a paid site, it has a feature which allows me to zoom into certain regions in texas to see actual snowfall numbers for counties that it puts out, same features for all the other short range models on weatherbell, global models will almost never see the heavy snow bands
-
- Posts: 5357
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2021 11:35 pm
- Location: College Station, Texas
- Contact:
thats as close as i can get to beaumont on that model, certain models have the option to zoom into specific regions of texas like se texas on that rgem run i shared , that regem a regional picture, some models on weatherbell even have a section called us cities where you can specifically zoom in to a city to see totals , the rgem cant zoom into specific cities, but i know a couple of models have houston as an option, beaumont might be one too, but ill look and see if i can find that one
-
- Posts: 5357
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2021 11:35 pm
- Location: College Station, Texas
- Contact:
snowman65 here is the 18z HRRR run from today, i was able to zoom into the golden triangle a bit more, hope this helps!
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
That is absolutely heartbreaking.TexasBreeze wrote: ↑Sun Jan 19, 2025 4:44 pm The 18 gfs has a fairly sharp cutoff northern Harris to the north with only about an inch or so in Northern Harris.
- christinac2016
- Posts: 156
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 3:18 pm
- Location: The Woodlands
- Contact:
Does this change for south Montgomery county?
Don’t worry. I’ve hated the 18z GFS for 25 yearsjabcwb2 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 19, 2025 5:28 pmThat is absolutely heartbreaking.TexasBreeze wrote: ↑Sun Jan 19, 2025 4:44 pm The 18 gfs has a fairly sharp cutoff northern Harris to the north with only about an inch or so in Northern Harris.
It’s an old joke. But seriously, I expect the 00z runs to change around again. They will fluctuate and you’ll probably see some banding pop-up in spots to the N and NW and NE again with gaps in-between. It’s impossible to say where. The overnight mesoscale models should have the “zone” for favored banding (especially the most-favored deformation zone) nailed down pretty good when we all wake up tomorrow. I’m getting my rest tonight after the next football game. Maybe some light snow at the stadium south of Buffalo.
- tireman4
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 6018
- Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 9:24 pm
- Location: Humble, Texas
- Contact:
jasons2k wrote: ↑Sun Jan 19, 2025 5:38 pmDon’t worry. I’ve hated the 18z GFS for 25 yearsjabcwb2 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 19, 2025 5:28 pmThat is absolutely heartbreaking.TexasBreeze wrote: ↑Sun Jan 19, 2025 4:44 pm The 18 gfs has a fairly sharp cutoff northern Harris to the north with only about an inch or so in Northern Harris.
It’s an old joke. But seriously, I expect the 00z runs to change around again. They will fluctuate and you’ll probably see some banding pop-up in spots to the N and NW and NE again with gaps in-between. It’s impossible to say where. The overnight mesoscale models should have the “zone” for favored banding (especially the most-favored deformation zone) nailed down pretty good when we all wake up tomorrow. I’m getting my rest tonight after the next football game. Maybe some light snow at the stadium south of Buffalo.
Everything Jason said about the 18z GFS, I echo.
Globals are useless at this range, right?
But even mesoscales don't look all that so far. For example, with the NAMs, there has been a clear trend towards suppression. And all of them actually warm the area up above freezing by Tuesday afternoon (most evident on NAM3km). Maybe something is amiss, but these are supposedly the models that "do well with shallow arctic air."
Same for FV3, ICON, etc.
HRRR12z and RGEM are exceptions, but they also have (almost) the entire state below freezing with little warm up (contrary to NWS DFW forecasts).
Trend for NAMs today below. May look similar to UKMET options if it continues. Maybe things move north ... but that also would increase warm nose and make everything a guaranteed sleet job.
But even mesoscales don't look all that so far. For example, with the NAMs, there has been a clear trend towards suppression. And all of them actually warm the area up above freezing by Tuesday afternoon (most evident on NAM3km). Maybe something is amiss, but these are supposedly the models that "do well with shallow arctic air."
Same for FV3, ICON, etc.
HRRR12z and RGEM are exceptions, but they also have (almost) the entire state below freezing with little warm up (contrary to NWS DFW forecasts).
Trend for NAMs today below. May look similar to UKMET options if it continues. Maybe things move north ... but that also would increase warm nose and make everything a guaranteed sleet job.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Posts: 1008
- Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 4:46 pm
- Location: NW Houston, TX
- Contact:
I wouldnt worry too much. This is a mesoscale model time frame now and also now casting as tomorrow comes around. I just posted that as an FYI for my area of Spring.
Dickinson ISD closed Tuesday and Wednesday.
ICON has near blizzard conditions in my area.
ICON has near blizzard conditions in my area.
Been here for years since Katrina.
-
- Information
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot], leejc396, Pas_Bon, TexasBreeze and 11 guests