sleetstorm wrote:32ºF is the current temperature here in Baytown.
Hasn't budged from 27 degrees here all day long.
sleetstorm wrote:32ºF is the current temperature here in Baytown.
I have been talking some with Larry Cosgrove on FB about this. He is the only met I know who got this right about no snow. I mentioned the sounding thing and he said that is not the problem, that there is enough data available without the Hou/Gal non-existant soundings. The 850 mb majic line for snow in this area(about -4c) was never really far enough South to give a good solid call for snow in Houston according to him. Do any of the pro-mets agree with this? I seem to remember that what he is saying is correct, at least in the later model runs, but in my desire for snow I think I ignored it. So I pose the question to the mets here. What did almost all the mets in our area miss? If Larry is correct in his assessment, why did so many not catch it and/or did they ignore it getting caught up in the wish for the big story(hype?)?vbhoutex wrote:Part of the problem with this one was, as posted earlier, not having enough sounding info to see the warm layer that was over our area. Based on the info available and interpretation required due to no direct Hou/Gal data the original predictions would seem to have been correct. Obviously they weren't, but it wasn't just a "bust" for a few mets, it was a "bust" for most mets in SE TX. JMHO. Pro mets feel free to correct me if I am wrong.helloitsb wrote:oh yeah, I was going to ask earlier before I took a nap, can one of the mets explain what went wrong with this system? The track of the ULL and stuff, I think it would help me learn thankswxman666 wrote:I am going to be tracking this one with you guys this week. Can I get some opinions from some experienced members or pro mets? With this past ice storm that hit today, and another possible winter storm event on wednesday, with temps below freezing possible ahead of the front...will this basically just cripple us even more? I am wondering if things will get worse (I mean seriously, sand trucks sliding and flipping over on I-10!?) or if it will be a reduced severity if warming occurs before the next storm. Thanks.
There is little doubt that we have a snow cover to our N, now.BiggieSmalls wrote:Is this event setting up to trend colder and colder with each passing day? Seems like thats what happened last week....
Not me - I stayed up all night last night with little cat naps during the event. Come Monday- probably so!txsnowmaker wrote:So who is staying up for the Euro/Canadian?!
Andrew wrote:txsnowmaker wrote:So who is staying up for the Euro/Canadian?!
I might. I am so burned out right now I will see what I can do.
I hear ya. Interesting that these arctic blasts have been progressively colder. Hard to imagine the next one being even more so, but as srain said, there is lots of snow pack above us now.ticka1 wrote:Not me - I stayed up all night last night with little cat naps during the event. Come Monday- probably so!txsnowmaker wrote:So who is staying up for the Euro/Canadian?!
Oh, come on, Ticka! I'll stay up with you!ticka1 wrote:Not me - I stayed up all night last night with little cat naps during the event. Come Monday- probably so!
txsnowmaker wrote:So who is staying up for the Euro/Canadian?!
That 850mb -4C rule is a general rule of thumb to use when you don't really know the atmospheric profile. If the 850mb temp is -4C or colder, then the vertical profile is most probably cold enough to support snow. But it doesn't work the other way around. That is, it can certainly snow with the 850mb temp warmer than -4C. It depends on the temperature of the rest of the atmosphere above and below 850mb (5000 ft).vbhoutex wrote: I have been talking some with Larry Cosgrove on FB about this. He is the only met I know who got this right about no snow. I mentioned the sounding thing and he said that is not the problem, that there is enough data available without the Hou/Gal non-existent soundings. The 850 mb majic line for snow in this area(about -4c) was never really far enough South to give a good solid call for snow in Houston according to him. Do any of the pro-mets agree with this? I seem to remember that what he is saying is correct, at least in the later model runs, but in my desire for snow I think I ignored it. So I pose the question to the mets here. What did almost all the mets in our area miss? If Larry is correct in his assessment, why did so many not catch it and/or did they ignore it getting caught up in the wish for the big story(hype?)?
I'm not sure what the point of staying up to 12:30am would be to wait for a model that may not have the right solution about next week for another 5 days.txsnowmaker wrote:So who is staying up for the Euro/Canadian?!