MontgomeryCoWx wrote:What a boring end to January... I can't wait for next Winter (El Nino by all accounts).

MontgomeryCoWx wrote:What a boring end to January... I can't wait for next Winter (El Nino by all accounts).
Fortunately, that graphic only has our temps down into the upper 30s.srainhoutx wrote:The CFS says nice Arctic dump near the end of the month, wxman57...wxman57 wrote:Just checking the overnight model runs. All have temps from 5-20F above normal from the Dakotas south through Texas for most of the next 15 days. No real cold to speak of south of Canada. They also indicate warming temps after the next week across the Plains (up to 15-20F above normal). The cold air still hasn't built into western Canada, though the models forecast it to build there this weekend.
Enjoy your cold weather yesterday and today, because that may be the coldest we see in January (at least). Here are a couple meteograms from the overnight run of the GFS. On the extended GFS, note that temps are only given for 6am and 6pm, so the afternoon highs will be 3-5 degrees warmer than what would be observed at 6pm. I was hoping for a bit warmer temps in the extended, but 70s is better than 50s.
Ed Mahmoud wrote:srainhoutx wrote:Looking at the long range/late January time frame, guidance is still 'sniffing' a potent storm crossing the Plains around the 25, +/- a couple of days. That trend has continued today and with the warmth expected over the next 7-10 days, the stage is being set for a possible severe weather event in the warm sector and much colder air spilling S as that storm complex passes off to the E.
Snow is nice, but it really is "my back yard". Unless one is making a connction in Chicago or Denver, does anyone really care if it snows there? Whereas severe, good tornado video from Oklahoma or Nebraska, I'm watching it on YouTube.
Nice to see the Euro sort of seeing what the post-truncation GFS has been hinting at about a storm ~10-12 days out.
Time will tell...MontgomeryCoWx wrote:srain, that last graphic looks like an Arctic invasion down the spine of the rockies, no?
I get the Euro ensembles out to 360 hrs. At 264 hrs now and rolling in. Curious to see what it shows that low height anomaly doing beyond 240hrs.srainhoutx wrote:Time will tell...MontgomeryCoWx wrote:srain, that last graphic looks like an Arctic invasion down the spine of the rockies, no?
If we see El Nino again this year, it would the first time since 2009 where it went La Nina to El Nino in one year. They tend to produce some of the coldest winters on record.wxman57 wrote:Current Nino 3.4 temps have been following very closely the pattern of 2007-2008-2009 (see below). European model predicts a spike upward this spring/summer, similar to what was seen in the spring of 2009. Other models aren't so bullish on the temperature rise. Could mean a significant drop in TC numbers this season.
The only extremely long range model is the CFS that extends to 1092 hours and the Euro weeklies. I have little confidence in either of those or any model beyond a 7 day period, if that. That said, when agreement does continue to show up as with the late month storm potential, my ears tend to perk up a bit...weatherguy425 wrote:Are there any EXTREMELY long range indications/models that show conditions in Canada changing by early February?
Any rain?wxman57 wrote:Agreed, srain. Nothing indicates any major weather maker down here over the next few weeks.
They're playing my tune at CPC:
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/p ... mp.new.gif
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 8 guests