txsnowmaker wrote:So who is staying up for the Euro/Canadian?!
I might. I am so burned out right now I will see what I can do.
Not me - I stayed up all night last night with little cat naps during the event. Come Monday- probably so!txsnowmaker wrote:So who is staying up for the Euro/Canadian?!
Andrew wrote:txsnowmaker wrote:So who is staying up for the Euro/Canadian?!
I might. I am so burned out right now I will see what I can do.
I hear ya. Interesting that these arctic blasts have been progressively colder. Hard to imagine the next one being even more so, but as srain said, there is lots of snow pack above us now.ticka1 wrote:Not me - I stayed up all night last night with little cat naps during the event. Come Monday- probably so!txsnowmaker wrote:So who is staying up for the Euro/Canadian?!
Oh, come on, Ticka! I'll stay up with you!ticka1 wrote:Not me - I stayed up all night last night with little cat naps during the event. Come Monday- probably so!
txsnowmaker wrote:So who is staying up for the Euro/Canadian?!
That 850mb -4C rule is a general rule of thumb to use when you don't really know the atmospheric profile. If the 850mb temp is -4C or colder, then the vertical profile is most probably cold enough to support snow. But it doesn't work the other way around. That is, it can certainly snow with the 850mb temp warmer than -4C. It depends on the temperature of the rest of the atmosphere above and below 850mb (5000 ft).vbhoutex wrote: I have been talking some with Larry Cosgrove on FB about this. He is the only met I know who got this right about no snow. I mentioned the sounding thing and he said that is not the problem, that there is enough data available without the Hou/Gal non-existent soundings. The 850 mb majic line for snow in this area(about -4c) was never really far enough South to give a good solid call for snow in Houston according to him. Do any of the pro-mets agree with this? I seem to remember that what he is saying is correct, at least in the later model runs, but in my desire for snow I think I ignored it.So I pose the question to the mets here. What did almost all the mets in our area miss? If Larry is correct in his assessment, why did so many not catch it and/or did they ignore it getting caught up in the wish for the big story(hype?)?
I'm not sure what the point of staying up to 12:30am would be to wait for a model that may not have the right solution about next week for another 5 days.txsnowmaker wrote:So who is staying up for the Euro/Canadian?!
I see your point, but I am usually up that late anyway.wxman57 wrote:I'm not sure what the point of staying up to 12:30am would be to wait for a model that may not have the right solution about next week for another 5 days.txsnowmaker wrote:So who is staying up for the Euro/Canadian?!
Are you SERIOUS!?snowman65 wrote:Call me crazy but it is SNOWING at my house right now!!!!:)...not heavy but it's sticking even..
Yes...we went to eat and I thought I saw flakes in front of my headlights..nobody believed me. It started snowing lightly at the restraunt then stopped. Came home and it's snowing here at the house. It's light but steady.....sticking to vehicles.wxman666 wrote:Are you SERIOUS!?snowman65 wrote:Call me crazy but it is SNOWING at my house right now!!!!:)...not heavy but it's sticking even..
Yea....it's too light for radar to pick up. That's what tells me it won't last long....snowman65 wrote:Good..as long as I'm not crazy!!
While that is true I stay up to see that one run where it shows a 1070mb high coming down from Canada and giving us temperatures in the teens or single digits. While it prob won't come true it is always fun to speculate and see what COULD happen.wxman57 wrote:I'm not sure what the point of staying up to 12:30am would be to wait for a model that may not have the right solution about next week for another 5 days.txsnowmaker wrote:So who is staying up for the Euro/Canadian?!
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot], leejc396, Pas_Bon, TexasBreeze and 11 guests